TATE et al. v. ANTOSH et al.

Appeals Nos. 77 C.D. 1971, 78 C.D. 1971, 79 C.D. 1971, and 80 C.D. 1971.

3 Pa.Commw. 144 (1971)

Tate, et al. v. Antosh, et al. Tate, et al. v. Monacello, et al. Philadelphia, et al. v. Monacello, et al. Philadelphia, et al. v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, et al.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

August 30, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. McNally, Jr., First Deputy City Solicitor, with him Howard D. Scher, Assistant City Solicitor, John Mattioni, Deputy City Solicitor, and Levy Anderson, City Solicitor, for appellants.

Thomas F. McDevitt, for appellee firemen; Richard Kirschner, for appellee nonuniformed employees; Francis X. Nolan, for appellee policemen, with them Stanley Bashman and Donsky, Katz, Levin & Bashman.

Argued June 3, 1971, before President Judge BOWMAN and Judges CRUMLISH, JR., KRAMER, WILKINSON, JR., MENCER and ROGERS.


OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE BOWMAN, August 30, 1971:

Although not so posed by the parties to these consolidated appeals, the fundamental issue is whether the judiciary — to enforce an admitted obligation of the City of Philadelphia to certain of its employees — may direct the legislative branch of the government of that city to appropriate funds to meet such obligations.

Prior decisional law makes solution of the issue difficult. Compounding the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases