ROOSTERTAIL, INC. v. PAGE

Docket No. 7612.

32 Mich. App. 94 (1971)

188 N.W.2d 224

THE ROOSTERTAIL, INC. v. PATTI PAGE

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided March 29, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kerr, Wattles & Russell (by Richard D. Weber), for plaintiff.

Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust & Kennedy (by George E. Brand, Jr. and George E. Ward), for defendants Patti Page and Pattack, Inc.

Hathaway, Ricard, Hathaway & Hathaway (by James A. Hathaway), for defendants American Guild of Variety Artists and David Mann.

Before: T.M. BURNS, P.J., and LEVIN and DAVIDSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, The Roostertail, Inc., commenced this action seeking a declaratory judgment that it is not bound by the results of arbitration proceedings instituted by defendants Patti Page and Pattack, Inc. The trial judge entered a summary judgment dismissing Roostertail's complaint on the ground that it had not exhausted its arbitration remedies. We reverse and remand for trial because there are factual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases