1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 333 F.Supp.
  5. 333 F.Supp. 914 (1971)
 

UNITED STATES v. PERILLO

Crim. A. Nos. 2104-2106, 2123.

333 F.Supp. 914 (1971)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. William J. PERILLO et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

September 2, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. L. Peter Stone, U. S. Atty., Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Harold Leshem, of Booker, Leshem, Green, Shaffer, Berl & Wise; Morton R. Kimmel; William C. Bradley, Jr., and Norman N. Aerenson, of Aerenson, Balick & Balick; John E. Babiarz, Jr., of Biondi & Babiarz, and Jay Conner, of Conner & Daley, Wilmington, Del., for defendants.

OPINION

LAYTON, District Judge.

The defendants in four criminal actions have moved to suppress certain evidence, i. e., telephone calls and other materials, obtained pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-25201 upon the ground that said statute, pursuant to which the evidence was seized, is unconstitutional.

Defendants' motion is based upon two wiretaps and pen registers (mechanical devices which record numbers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases