1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 339 F.Supp.
  5. 339 F.Supp. 836 (1971)
 

FASHION TWO TWENTY, INC. v. STEINBERG

No. 71 C 665.

339 F.Supp. 836 (1971)

FASHION TWO TWENTY, INC., Plaintiff, v. Rudolph STEINBERG et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. New York.

October 29, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Weiss, Goldberg, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City by Jay Greenfield, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Shaw, Bernstein, Scheuer, Boyden & Sarnoff, New York City by Frederick B. Boyden, New York City, of counsel, for defendants Marjo, Inc. and individuals.

Nickerson, Kramer, Lowenstein, Nessen & Kamin, New York City by Geoffrey M. Kalmus, New York City, of counsel, for defendants Steinberg and Jericho Laboratories, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

MISHLER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff moves for a preliminary injunction. The defendants Marjo, Inc., Marvin E. Roseberry, Jo Roseberry, Finelle Industries, Maurice Feigenbaum, Dorothy L. Feigenbaum and Hal Hoham move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure claiming lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lack of original jurisdiction (as to all claims as they relate to the above...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases