McGILL v. HULING BUICK COMPANY


487 P.2d 656 (1971)

R.S. McGill and Majorie W. McGill, Respondents, v. HULING BUICK COMPANY, an Oregon Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided July 15, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Anderson, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Hale G. Thompson, Thompson, Mumford & Woodrich, Eugene.

David A. Vinson, Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Sahlstrom, Starr & Vinson, Eugene.


TONGUE, Justice.

This is an action for damages for fraud in the sale of an automobile by an automobile dealer. Defendant appeals from a jury verdict and judgment for $900 in actual damages and $4,999 in punitive damages.1

On this appeal defendant does not contend that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict or that there was any error relating to the admission of evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases