1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 256 Md.
  5. 256 Md. 469 (1970)
 

LUSBY v. NETHKEN

[No. 111, September Term, 1969.]

256 Md. 469 (1970)

260 A.2d 640

LUSBY, ET AL. v. NETHKEN, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 12, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard H. Wonneman and Hyman Ginsberg, with whom were Ginsberg & Ginsberg on the brief, for appellants.

Wilbur D. Preston, Jr., with whom were Luther B. Ditch, Ascanio S. Boccuti and Due, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston and Lewis R. Jones on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

McWILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The genesis of this seemingly senseless quarrel is obscure. Its flowering was the filing by the appellants (George and Louise) of a bill of complaint in which Robert was accused of inducing their mother (Caroline) "to arrange her affairs so as to inure to the benefit of * * * Robert * * * and to the disadvantage of * * * [appellants]." Caroline, they alleged, was "so infirm, debilitated and senile" for the three...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases