1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 56 N.J.
  5. 56 N.J. 7 (1970)
 

HAMMOND v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO.

56 N.J. 7 (1970)

264 A.2d 204

HONORA HAMMOND, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 20, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mrs. Mabel L. Richardson argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Stavis, Richardson, Koenigsberg & Rossmoore, attorneys).

Mr. James A. Robottom argued the cause for respondent-respondent (Messrs. Haskins, Robottom & Hack, attorneys; Mr. James A. Robottom on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.

In this workmen's compensation case, the sole issue is whether petitioner is entitled to recover for injuries she received when she fell at a point near her employer's premises shortly after leaving work. Both the Division of Workmen's Compensation and the County Court held that petitioner's injuries were not compensable since the accident did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. N.J.S.A.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases