1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 55 N.J.
  5. 55 N.J. 542 (1970)
 

ODOLECKI v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO.

55 N.J. 542 (1970)

264 A.2d 38

DOUGLAS ODOLECKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 20, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lawrence S. Grossman argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Burton, Quackenboss & Axelrod, attorneys; Mr. Lawrence S. Grossman on the brief).

Mr. James F. Norton argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Lane & Evans, attorneys; Mr. James F. Norton on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.

This case concerns the question of coverage under the omnibus clause of an automobile liability insurance policy. The policy was issued by the defendant, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (Hartford) to Mrs. Kathryn Zylka, and covered her automobile which was involved in a collision on July 7, 1964. The omnibus clause was of standard form and provided in pertinent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases