1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 110 N.J.
  5. 110 N.J. Super. 462 (1970)
 

PRICE v. BUCKINGHAM MANUFACTURING CO., INC.

110 N.J. Super. 462 (1970)

266 A.2d 140

LORRAINE M. PRICE, AS GENERAL ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH R. PRICE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BUCKINGHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT, AND R.H. BUHRKE, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 15, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James H. Smith argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Reussille, Cornwell, Mausner & Carotenuto, attorneys).

Mr. Phillip Auerbach argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Drazin, Warshaw, Auerbach & Rudnick, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and KOLOVSKY.

PER CURIAM.

Our disposition of the points of appeal argued is as follows:

1. The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. In fact, plaintiff's case for a defect in the safety belt was marginal at best.

2. There was no error in admitting into evidence specifications for safety belts adopted by other large users of such equipment such as the Bell System and the United States Government. See McComish v. DeSoi, 42 N.J....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases