1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 258 Md.
  5. 258 Md. 204 (1970)
 

LICHTENBERG v. ANNE ARUNDEL CTY.

[No. 356, September Term, 1969.]

258 Md. 204 (1970)

265 A.2d 222

LICHTENBERG, ET AL. v. ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 12, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Preston A. Pairo, with whom were Pairo & Pairo on the brief, for Jerome M. Lichtenberg et ux., part of appellants and by Ascanio S. Boccuti, with whom were B. Conway Taylor, Jr., and Due, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston on the brief, for Security Insurance Company of Hartford and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, other appellants.

John M. Court, Assistant County Solicitor, with whom was Phillip F. Scheibe, County Solicitor, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN and SINGLEY, JJ.

SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from judgments of $14,500 and $5,400 recovered by Anne Arundel County (the County) in suits against Mr. and Mrs. Jerome M. Lichtenberg (the Lichtenbergs) and Security Insurance Company of Hartford, as successor by merger to New Amsterdam Casualty Company, in the first case, and against the Lichtenbergs and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, in the second...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases