1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 260 Md.
  5. 260 Md. 142 (1970)
 

TEDROW v. FORD MOTOR CO.

[No. 129, September Term, 1970.]

260 Md. 142 (1970)

271 A.2d 688

TEDROW v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 15, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank R. Holtzman, with whom was Robert D. Tedrow, Jr., in proper person, on the brief, for appellant.

Laidler B. Mackall, with whom was James C. Christopher on the brief, for Ford Motor Company, part of appellees.

S. Michael Pincus, with whom was Samuel Gordon on the brief, for Martin Deskin et al., other appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

This attempted appeal from an order granting summary judgment calls for further reiteration of Maryland Rule 605 a. The appellant, Robert D. Tedrow, Jr., dissatisfied with the performance of a used automobile, brought an action in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County against eight defendants, including the Ford Motor Company for fraud, civil conspiracy, breach of contract and breach of warranty. Judge Miller...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases