1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 317 F.Supp.
  5. 317 F.Supp. 1317 (1970)
 

HYDRO-CLEAR CORPORATION v. AER-O-FLO CORPORATION

No. C 69-748.

317 F.Supp. 1317 (1970)

HYDRO-CLEAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AER-O-FLO CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

March 31, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Tilberry, Robert V. Vickers, Barry L. Springel, Meyer, Tilberry & Body, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Robert G. McCreary, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBROS, District Judge.

In this motion to dismiss for improper venue of the defendant, Aer-O-Flo Corporation, the basic issue is whether a corporation resides in all the judicial districts of the state of its incorporation for purposes of venue under the venue statute for patent infringement actions. The applicable statute reads as follows:

"Any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases