1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 318 F.Supp.
  5. 318 F.Supp. 1252 (1970)
 

AUTOMATED BUILDING COMPONENTS, INC. v. TRUELINE TRUSS CO.

Civ. No. 67-230.

318 F.Supp. 1252 (1970)

AUTOMATED BUILDING COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. TRUELINE TRUSS CO., Inc., and Gerald M. McCormack, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

April 16, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rives & Schwab, Portland, Or., LeBlanc & Shur, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Buckhorn, Blore, Klarquist & Sparkman, Portland, Or., for defendants.

OPINION

SOLOMON, Chief Judge.

Automated Building Components, Inc. (ABC) seeks to hold Trueline Truss Co. (Trueline) and Gerald M. McCormack in contempt of this Court's consent decree in Civil No. 67-230. That decree enjoined Trueline and McCormack from infringing ABC's United States Patent 3,304,106.

Trueline and McCormack filed a counterclaim against ABC for damages for violations of the Sherman and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases