BAUER v. RICHARDSON


475 P.2d 995 (1970)

In the matter of the Compensation of Leo J. BAUER, Claimant. Leo J. Bauer, Appellant, v. Johnnie W. RICHARDSON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 1.

Decided November 2, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Marsch, Bend, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

William M. Holmes, Bend, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Gray, Fancher, Holmes & Hurley, Bend.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FOLEY and FORT, JJ.


FORT, Judge.

This workmen's compensation case presents two questions. (1) Was the claimant a workman within the Act? (2) Was the work being done by the claimant in the course of the "trade, business or profession of his employer" within the meaning of ORS 656.027(3) (a)? The employer contends the answer to each question is in the negative.

The hearing officer answered the first question in the affirmative and the second in the negative, thus rejecting the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases