1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 319 F.Supp.
  5. 319 F.Supp. 1133 (1970)
 

LoCICERO v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 69-2124.

319 F.Supp. 1133 (1970)

Joseph LoCICERO and Dot'l Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E. D. Louisiana, New Orleans Division.

November 9, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerry A. Brown, Richard W. Bussoff, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff.

Bernard J. Caillouet, Lancelot P. Olinde, Francis J. Mooney Jr., New Orleans, La., William Simon, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

RUBIN, District Judge:

When he was denied renewal of a lease to operate an Esso station, Joseph LoCicero sued Humble Oil and Refining Company, which was both his landlord and supplier, claiming that it had violated the antitrust laws in two ways: it had engaged in a conspiracy to fix prices in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. sections 1 and 2, and it had exacted an illegal tie-in arrangement in contravention of both the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act, 15 U...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases