OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
The conviction is for assault with intent to murder with malice; the punishment, five years.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. In his first ground of error, the appellant contends that the trial court erred in admitting a pistol into evidence, because the State failed to identify the pistol.
The State's testimony shows that the appellant, armed with a pistol and without provocation, entered a room...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.