1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 312 F.Supp.
  5. 312 F.Supp. 778 (1970)
 

MONSANTO COMPANY v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 68-1269.

312 F.Supp. 778 (1970)

MONSANTO COMPANY v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

As Amended March 2 and March 4, 1970.

Supplemental Opinion May 21, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wolfe, Hubbard, Voit & Osann, by C. Frederick Leydig, Phillip H. Mayer, John Rosenquist, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Connolly, Bove & Lodge, by Arthur G. Connolly, Werner H. Hutz, Brereton Sturtevant, Wilmington, Del., for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT, OPINION, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER.

MASTERSON, District Judge.

A. NATURE OF ACTION AND JURISDICTION

1. Plaintiff (hereinafter "Monsanto") is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Defendant (hereinafter "Rohm and Haas") is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Final Pre-Trial Order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases