KENDALL v. KENDALL

Nos. 42276, 42315.

181 N.W.2d 894 (1970)

LaVoice E. KENDALL, Respondent-Appellant, v. George D. KENDALL, Appellant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 11, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katz, Taube, Lange & Frommelt, Minneapolis, for respondent-appellant.

Robert W. Patterson, Rochester, for appellant-respondent.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and MURPHY, ROGOSHESKE, PETERSON, and ROSENGREN, JJ.


OPINION

PER CURIAM.

These cross-appeals from a judgment in a divorce action raise issues that warrant little discussion.

Defendant husband contends, first, that the evidence was insufficient to justify the granting of a divorce to plaintiff wife on grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment and, further, that the court's finding of that fact lacked requisite detail. Careful study of the record discloses substantial evidence to support a finding of serious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases