KANE ASSOCS. v. BLUMENSON


23 N.Y.2d 942 (1969)

Kane Associates, a Copartnership, Plaintiff, v. Philip Blumenson et al., Defendants. Edward T. Klett, Appellant, v. Philip Blumenson et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 19, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick L. Sohn for appellant.

Philip Blumenson, respondent in person and for Herman R. Sussman, respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and BREITEL. Judges KEATING and JASEN dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the order of Special Term in the following memorandum.


Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

KEATING and JASEN, JJ. (dissenting).

Under settled law, a receiver in foreclosure is entitled to all rents, including those due but unpaid at the time of his appointment, which have not been reduced to the possession of the landlord at the time the receiver qualifies. (New York Life Ins. Co. v. Fulton Development Corp., 265 N.Y. 348...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases