1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 255 Md.
  5. 255 Md. 674 (1969)
 

TRACEY v. UNSAT. C. & J. FUND

[No. 59, September Term, 1969.]

255 Md. 674 (1969)

259 A.2d 276

TRACEY, ET AL. v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 2, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Hackett, with whom was William H. Zinman on the brief, for appellants.

William E. Brannan, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, C. MacNair Speed and Lord, Whip, Coughlan & Green on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN and SINGLEY, JJ. and CHARLES E. ORTH, JR., Associate Judge of the Court of Special Appeals, specially assigned.

SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case involves the interplay between the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Statute of Maryland, Maryland Code (1957, 1967 Repl. Vol.) Art. 66 1/2, § 150 et seq. (the Maryland Fund) and that of New Jersey, N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 (1961) (the New Jersey Fund).1 The appellants, James Tracey and Mattie Ames, residents of New Jersey, brought suit against Ruby Mae Bracey, a resident of Maryland...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases