1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 298 F.Supp.
  5. 298 F.Supp. 574 (1969)
 

FEDERAL LABOR UNION NO. 18887 v. MIDVALE-HEPPENSTALL CO.

Civ. A. No. 68-252.

298 F.Supp. 574 (1969)

FEDERAL LABOR UNION NO. 18887 Affiliated with the A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. MIDVALE-HEPPENSTALL COMPANY.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 26, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Davis, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Arthur R. Littleton, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, Pa., Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

WOOD, District Judge.

Both parties have moved for summary judgment in this case in which jurisdiction is invoked under Section 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947 as well as the Arbitration Act of 1947, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1, 10. The plaintiff is a union engaged in the representation in collective bargaining of the hourly production and maintenance employees of the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases