1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 270 Cal.App.2d
  5. 270 Cal.App.2d 499 (1969)
 

WURCHE v. STENZEL

Docket No. 25323.

270 Cal.App.2d 499 (1969)

75 Cal. Rptr. 856

FRIEDA WURCHE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. KARL STENZEL et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

March 10, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Palmer & Grundstrom and Clark M. Palmer for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Freitas, Allen, McCarthy, Bettini & MacMahon and Jay R. MacMahon for Defendants and Appellants.

ELKINGTON, J.

Defendants Karl Stenzel and Heinz Lund have appealed from a judgment, after a court trial, declaring that the administrator of the estate of Gus Stenzel, deceased, holds such estate in trust for plaintiff Frieda Wurche. Frieda Wurche cross-appeals from the judgment insofar as it denies her the "alternative" relief sought for the reasonable value of services rendered the deceased Gus Stenzel during his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases