1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 105 N.J.
  5. 105 N.J. Super. 604 (1969)
 

CARDELL, INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF MADISON

105 N.J. Super. 604 (1969)

253 A.2d 826

CARDELL, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND J. RICHARD HUDANICH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF MADISON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MANZO CONTRACTING CO., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 1, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Stewart M. Hutt argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Hutt & Berkow, attorneys).

Mr. Marc J. Gordon and Mr. Mark L. Stanton argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Stanton & Recht, attorneys).

Before Judges GAULKIN, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Seidman, 105 N.J.Super. 594.

LABRECQUE, J.A.D. (dissenting).

In this case I would hold that plaintiff Cardell was the lowest responsible bidder and should have been awarded the contract on the basis of $873,350, the corrected grand total of the individual items comprising its bid.

The specifications called for bids on seven different...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases