1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 107 N.J.
  5. 107 N.J. Super. 588 (1969)
 

STATE v. HAMMOND

107 N.J. Super. 588 (1969)

259 A.2d 718

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CLAUDE HAMMOND, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 18, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel R. De Luca for defendant (Messrs. Krivit & Krivit, attorneys).

Mr. Edward C. Megill, Assistant Prosecutor, for plaintiff (Mr. James A. Tumulty, Jr., Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney).

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and KOLOVSKY.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in limiting the six defendants, including appellant, to ten peremptory challenges collectively, rather than allowing them ten each. N.J.S. 2A:78-7; R.R. 3:7-2(c) (now R. 1:8-3(d)). See State v. Rogers, 19 N.J. 218, 227 (1955). Common legal representation at trial does not affect the right.

Defendants exhausted the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases