1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 54 N.J.
  5. 54 N.J. 585 (1969)
 

NEWMARK v. GIMBEL'S INCORPORATED

54 N.J. 585 (1969)

258 A.2d 697

RUTH NEWMARK AND DUDLEY NEWMARK, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. GIMBEL'S INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION, AND SELIGMAN & LATZ PARAMUS CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 17, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Albert E. Fershing and Alvin D. Hersh argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. Richard D. Bennett, attorney).

Mr. Herman B. Packer argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Saul Peres, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.

This appeal involves the liability of a beauty parlor operator for injury to a patron's hair and scalp allegedly resulting from a product used in the giving of a permanent wave. The action was predicated upon charges of negligence and breach of express and implied warranty. Trial was had before the county district court and a jury. At the close of the proof, the court ruled as matter of law that the warranty theory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases