1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 104 N.J.
  5. 104 N.J. Super. 525 (1969)
 

LISCHIN v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

104 N.J. Super. 525 (1969)

250 A.2d 600

RICHARD H. LISCHIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 28, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Isaac C. Ginsburg argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Feinberg & Ginsburg, attorneys).

Mr. Ronald I. Bloom argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Finn & Rimm, attorneys).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEWIS.

PER CURIAM.

This case involves the interpretation of a coverage clause of an automobile owner's comprehensive insurance policy issued by defendant. The clause in question, under "Supplementary Payments," provides:

"(b) if the automobile is stolen, pay $10.00 per day, subject to a maximum of $300, for loss of use until settlement for such theft is offered by the Company. Such loss of use shall begin 48 hours after the theft is reported to the Company and police...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases