1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 107 N.J.
  5. 107 N.J. Super. 495 (1969)
 

JAMAR v. HODGES

107 N.J. Super. 495 (1969)

259 A.2d 466

GEORGE THEODORE JAMAR, JR., AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, GEORGE THEODORE JAMAR, SR., AND GEORGE THEODORE JAMAR, SR., INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS v. TYRONE HODGES, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 28, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Leonard S. Sachar argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Sachar, Sachar & Bernstein, attorneys).

Mr. Lawrence S. Grossman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Burton, Quackenboss & Axelrod, attorneys).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, CARTON and HALPERN.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by SULLIVAN, P.J.A.D.

This appeal in a pedestrian automobile accident case involving an uninsured driver, raises the question whether a proposed additur to a jury verdict fixing damages requires the consent of the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund in addition to the consent of the uninsured driver-defendant. The trial court held that it could not enter the additur as a judgment without the Fund's consent. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases