1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 305 F.Supp.
  5. 305 F.Supp. 285 (1969)
 

UNITED STATES v. GRINNELL CORPORATION

No. 65 Civ. 2486.

305 F.Supp. 285 (1969)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. GRINNELL CORPORATION, American District Telegraph Company, Holmes Electric Protective Company and Automatic Fire Alarm Company of Delaware, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

October 20, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Noel E. Story, Antitrust Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Cahill, Gordon, Sonnett, Reindel & Ohl, New York City, for defendant Grinnell Corp.

White & Case, New York City, for defendant American District Telegraph Co.

Kelley, Drye, Newhall, Maginnes & Warren, New York City, for defendant Holmes Electric Protective Co.

Stickles, Hayden, Kennedy, Hort & Van Steenburgh, New York City, for defendant Automatic Fire Alarm Co. of Delaware.

METZNER, District Judge:

Defendants move for partial summary judgment against the federal government, plaintiff in this action, based on the four-year statute of limitations governing antitrust suits. Clayton Act § 4B, ch. 283, § 1, 69 Stat. 282, 283 (1955), codified in 15 U.S.C. § 15b. They also request leave to amend their answers to accord with their position. They seek to bar any of plaintiff's claims which accrued over four years before the filing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases