1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 104 N.J.
  5. 104 N.J. Super. 477 (1969)
 

SINOWAY v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE

104 N.J. Super. 477 (1969)

250 A.2d 429

RUSSELL SINOWAY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE AND THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 26, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Max Spinrad argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Spinrad, Steinberg & Marshall, attorneys).

Mr. Saul J. Zucker argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Zucker, Lowenstein, Gurny and Zucker, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The building inspector of the Village of South Orange denied plaintiff's application for a building permit to convert the porch of his residence into an office for use in his practice of optometry. The permit was denied on the ground that the building is in a "Residence A" zone, where the use of a building as a combined residence and office is prohibited under section 6, paragraph 604.0(b). By way of exception under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases