1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 301 F.Supp.
  5. 301 F.Supp. 273 (1969)
 

ANSUL COMPANY v. UNIROYAL, INC.

No. 68 Civ. 2244.

301 F.Supp. 273 (1969)

The ANSUL COMPANY, Plaintiff, and Daly-Herring Co., Carolina Chemical Co., Louisville Chemical Co., Food Machinery Co. and Triangle Chemical Co., Plaintiff-Interveners, v. UNIROYAL, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 6, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morgan, Finnegan, Durham & Pine, New York City, for plaintiff and plaintiffs-interveners; John A. Diaz and David H. Pfeffer, New York City, of counsel.

Arthur, Dry, Kalish, Taylor & Wood, New York City, for defendant; Bert J. Lewen, Martin J. Cohen, Steven H. Bazerman, Kenyon & Kenyon, Malvin R. Mandelbaum, New York City, of counsel.

MANSFIELD, District Judge.

In this action for a declaratory judgment initiated by plaintiff Ansul, in which plaintiffs-interveners later joined, plaintiff seeks an adjudication of invalidity, unenforceability and non-infringement of Claims 1 and 7 of U. S. Patent No. 2,614,916 (the "916" patent herein), issued on October 21, 1952 to two scientists then employed by defendant Uniroyal, Inc. (Otto Hoffman and Dwight Schoene) and assigned by them to it, which granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases