1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 434 Pa.
  5. 434 Pa. 131 (1969)
 

PIERRO v. PIERRO

434 Pa. 131 (1969)

Pierro, Appellant, v. Pierro.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 23, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl M. Mazzocone, with him Glenn A. Troutman, Victor S. Jaczun, and Sheer & Mazzocone, and Power, Bowen & Valimont, for appellants.

Frank Carano, with him Charles H. Dorsett, Jr., and Carano and Kunken, and Eastburn & Gray, for appellees.

Before BELL, C.J., JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS and POMEROY, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE COHEN, April 23, 1969:

Plaintiff instituted an action in equity to compel specific performance of a provision in an agreement for the sale of a portion of a farm. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint and under "New Matter" alleged that specific performance did not lie for the reason that the parcel in controversy was not described with sufficient specificity to remove it from the provisions of the Statute of Frauds.

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases