1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 298 F.Supp.
  5. 298 F.Supp. 226 (1969)
 

UNITED STATES v. HEXT

Civ. A. No. 65-B-75.

298 F.Supp. 226 (1969)

UNITED STATES of America v. Walter A. HEXT, Sr., W. A. Hext & Sons Gin Company, Inc., Marshall & Marshall, a corporation, and Harlingen Compress Company.

United States District Court S. D. Texas, Brownsville Division.

April 7, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., and Frank C. Cooksey, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff.

Carter, Stiernberg, Skaggs & Koppel (Rollins M. Koppel), Harlingen, Tex., for defendant Marshall & Marshall.

Bonner & Ball (Nile E. Ball), Harlingen, Tex., for third-party defendant Harlingen Compress Co.

MEMORANDUM

GARZA, District Judge.

This suit is one based on conversion and statutory violation. It concerns the activities of three parties and their dealings with some 578 bales of cotton upon which the United States had a valid crop chattel mortgage lien.

The Court has been given jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1345, and this jurisdiction has not been challenged in any way.

The Defendants are citizens of, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases