1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 254 Md.
  5. 254 Md. 265 (1969)
 

ZALIS v. BLUMENTHAL

[No. 304, September Term, 1968.]

254 Md. 265 (1969)

254 A.2d 692

ZALIS v. BLUMENTHAL, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 25, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Mattingly for appellant.

Charles A. Carlton, with whom were Shapiro & Weil on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, McWILLIAMS, FINAN and SINGLEY, JJ.

HAMMOND, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellant Zalis, who seemingly never has been licensed as a real estate broker and was last licensed as a real estate salesman for the 1963 license year (May 1, 1963 to April 30, 1964), sued the appellees, licensed real estate brokers trading as Riggs Realty, for that they did agree to pay him:

"a finder's fee [of $15,000] under written contract dated July 23, 1965 [which read "It is hereby agreed that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases