1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 105 N.J.
  5. 105 N.J. Super. 407 (1969)
 

PRIBISH v. CORBETT

105 N.J. Super. 407 (1969)

252 A.2d 731

MICHAEL A. PRIBISH AND LORRAINE H. PRIBISH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HARRY J. CORBETT AND JEAN P. CORBETT, JOHN H. OSBORN, ETC., AND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF NEW SHREWSBURY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 1, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Daniel J. O'Hern argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Abramoff, Apy & O'Hern, attorneys).

Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Jr. argued the cause for respondents Harry J. Corbett and Jean P. Corbett (Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Warren, attorneys).

Mr. S. Thomas Gagliano argued the cause for respondent Board of Adjustment of New Shrewsbury (Messrs. Potter and Gagliano, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

PER CURIAM.

The oral conclusions stated by the Law Division have the agreement of this court. Subject to the modification of the judgment in respect of the encroachment of the proposed retaining wall on the public easement, mentioned hereinafter, the judgment will be affirmed essentially for the reasons given by the trial court.

We have this specific comment concerning plaintiffs' argument that the recent decisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases