1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 252 Md.
  5. 252 Md. 227 (1969)
 

HUTZELL v. BOYER

[No. 23, September Term, 1968.]

252 Md. 227 (1969)

249 A.2d 449

HUTZELL v. BOYER

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 23, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth J. Mackley and Evan Crossley, with whom were Howard W. Gilbert, Jr. Ottinger, Mackley & Gilbert, Crossley & Latimer, Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, and William E. Brannan, Assistant Attorney General, on the brief, for appellant.

Leroy W. Preston, with whom were O'Connor & Preston, Irving M. Einbinder and Edwin F. Nikirk on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, BARNES, FINAN and SINGLEY, JJ.

FINAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In 1963 plaintiff-appellee, Robert E. Boyer and defendant-appellant, Claude M. Hutzell, had been working on various paving construction jobs in the Fredericksburg, Virginia area. During that year the superintendent of paving for the General Paving Corporation, Mr. Robert Cole, offered both men jobs with his company. General Paving is a Virginia corporation engaged in the laying of asphalt roads and driveways in the Fairfax...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases