1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 305 F.Supp.
  5. 305 F.Supp. 139 (1969)
 

HOLMES v. THEW SHOVEL COMPANY

No. C 64-240.

305 F.Supp. 139 (1969)

William C. HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. The THEW SHOVEL COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

July 1, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher B. Fagan, Fay, Sharpe & Mulholland, and F. Rush McKnight, Calfee, Halter, Calfee, Griswold & Sommer, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Jarrett Ross Clark, Wolfe, Hubbard, Voit & Osann, Chicago, Ill., Robert Kennedy, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Cleveland, Ohio, and William A. Denny, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBROS, District Judge.

This is an action for patent infringement and unfair competition. The plaintiff, in Count 1 of his complaint, has alleged that the defendant is infringing plaintiff's patent No. 3,043,445, which relates to a device for controlling the boom on certain power cranes. Count 2 of the complaint seeks damages for the breach of a confidential relationship. Plaintiff alleges in Count 2 that he disclosed certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases