1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 54 N.J.
  5. 54 N.J. 132 (1969)
 

LISCHIN v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

54 N.J. 132 (1969)

253 A.2d 803

RICHARD H. LISCHIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 4, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Isaac C. Ginsburg argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Feinberg & Ginsburg, attorneys).

Mr. Ronald I. Bloom argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Finn and Rimm, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We reverse, essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lewis in his dissenting opinion below. Lischin v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 104 N.J.Super. 525, 527 (App. Div. 1969).

All members of the Appellate Division agreed that the company's undertaking to pay for loss of use of the stolen automobile "until setlement for such theft is offered by the Company" was ambiguous in nature....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases