1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 300 F.Supp.
  5. 300 F.Supp. 1394 (1969)
 

STUDNER v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3865; Protests 60/24477-7127-60, etc.

300 F.Supp. 1394 (1969)

David STUDNER et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

July 8, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, New York City (Allan H. Kamnitz, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Velta A. Melnbrencis, New York City, trial atty.), for defendant.

Before RAO, FORD and NEWMAN, Judges.

RAO, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved herein is described on the invoices and entries as "old printing blocks" or as "wooden printing blocks". It was assessed with duty at 40 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 395 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas.Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, as print blocks or print rollers, not specially provided for, of whatever material composed, used for printing, stamping, or cutting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases