1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 294 F.Supp.
  5. 294 F.Supp. 1193 (1969)
 

FRALEY v. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 66-415.

294 F.Supp. 1193 (1969)

Charles M. FRALEY, Plaintiff, v. The CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

January 23, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McArdle & McLaughlin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Mercer & Buckley, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

OPINION

DUMBAULD, District Judge.

The question for decision here is whether, upon the record before us as developed after full opportunity for discovery,1 the activities of the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company within the Western District of Pennsylvania are sufficiently substantial and continuous as to constitute "doing business" within the meaning of 45 U.S.C. § 562 so as to justify litigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases