MILLER v. WEINER

Civ. A. No. 68-21.

298 F.Supp. 1016 (1969)

Addie Mae MILLER, Plaintiff, v. Joseph WEINER, Defendant.

United States District Court D. South Carolina, Charleston Division.

Decided April 18, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ira J. Bloom, of Pritchard, Myers & Morrison, Charleston, S. C., for plaintiff.

Joseph R. Young, of Young, Clement & Rivers, Charleston, S. C., for defendant.


HEMPHILL, District Judge.

The court considers defendant's post-trial motion for judgment non obstante veredicto or for a new trial in the alternative. Counsel for respective parties were heard in oral argument at Charleston, March 28, 1969.

Defendant's first ground is that the court erred in refusing his motion for a directed verdict when the only reasonable inference to be drawn from all of the testimony was that this was an unavoidable accident and that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases