1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 303 F.Supp.
  5. 303 F.Supp. 999 (1969)
 

SHERIDAN v. LIQUOR SALESMEN'S U., LOCAL 2, D.R.W. & A.W.I.U.A.

No. 69 Civ. 2484.

303 F.Supp. 999 (1969)

John SHERIDAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. LIQUOR SALESMEN'S UNION, LOCAL 2, D.R.W. and A.W.I.U.A., AFL-CIO, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 18, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Godfrey P. Schmidt, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Victor Feingold, Stanley J. Reiben, New York City, for defendants.

OPINION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTLEY, District Judge.

On June 9, 1969, plaintiffs, who are members of defendant local union, filed their complaint in this action. A first cause of action is predicated on § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (suits for violation of collective labor contract), and has nothing to do with the instant motions.1 The second cause of action predicates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases