1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 295 F.Supp.
  5. 295 F.Supp. 820 (1969)
 

ROSENBERG v. UNITED STATES

No. 67 C 225(1).

295 F.Supp. 820 (1969)

Dan ROSENBERG and Mary Rosenberg, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.

January 30, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor Packman, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Veryl L. Riddle, U. S. Atty., Jim J. Shoemake, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., Elliott H. Kajan, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HARPER, Chief Judge.

This is a suit for income tax refund, with jurisdiction founded upon 28 U.S. C.A. § 1346(a) (1). Originally instituted by Dan and Mary Rosenberg, pursuant to Rule 25 upon the untimely death of the taxpayer Dan Rosenberg, the present parties were substituted and this action shall proceed in their favor. In view of the fact that the suit deals solely with the income and earnings of Dan Rosenberg for the tax years...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases