1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 300 F.Supp.
  5. 300 F.Supp. 757 (1969)
 

EVERPREST, INC. v. PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 975-S.

300 F.Supp. 757 (1969)

EVERPREST, INC., a Corporation, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION, a Corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court M. D. Alabama S. D.

March 4, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Truman Hobbs, Hobbs, Copeland, Franco, Riggs & Screws, Montgomery, Ala., Robert H. Berdo, Arnold, Roylance, Kruger & Durkee, Washington, D. C., and C. Preston Allen, Ray, Quinney & Nebeker, Salt Lake City, Utah, for plaintiff.

Carey Chitwood, Martin, Balch, Bingham, Hawthorne & Williams, Birmingham, Ala., Barrett G. Kreisberg, Eugene Frederick Roth and Munson & Fiddler, New York City, for defendant.

ORDER

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

This cause is now submitted on defendant's motion to transfer this cause to the Southern District of New York under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a).

This is an action for patent infringement brought by a Utah corporation having its principal place of business in Salt Lake City, Utah, against a New York corporation which has five manufacturing plants in the State of Alabama. The venue statute for patent infringement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases