1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 280 F.Supp.
  5. 280 F.Supp. 674 (1968)
 

MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING CO. v. NORTON CO.

Civ. A. No. 37154.

280 F.Supp. 674 (1968)

MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. NORTON COMPANY, Studebaker-Packard Corporation, and Hadco Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

On Motion for New Trial January 29, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas V. Koykka of Arter, Hadden, Wykoff & Van Duzer, Cleveland, Ohio, Edward A. Haight of Haight, Simmons & Hofeldt, Chicago, Ill., Harold J. Kinney and Stanley G. DeLaHunt of Carpenter, Kinney & Coulter, St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiffs.

George H. Rudolph, Jones, Day, Cockley & Reavis, Cleveland, Ohio, and John W. Malley, Allen Kirkpatrick, Carl G. Love and Wm. K. West, Jr., of Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D. C., Hugh E. Smith, Troy, N. Y., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GREEN, District Judge.

This is an action alleging infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 2,958,593, hereinafter referred to as the Hoover patent. Claims one through eight, of a total of thirteen claims, are in issue herein. Plaintiff is the assignee of the inventors, Howard L. Hoover, Eugene J. Dupre and Walter J. Rankin, each of whom was in plaintiff's employ at the time the patented product was developed.

The patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases