Motion for amendment of remittitur denied. Defendant on his appeal to this court urged only that the means used by the People, in proving fingerprints found on an object taken from the burglarized premises were his, was unnecessarily prejudicial. No claim was made that defendant's rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States were violated. The only possible Federal constitutional issue alluded to in defendant's brief in this court suggested a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
