1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 294 F.Supp.
  5. 294 F.Supp. 412 (1968)
 

E. B. ELLIOTT ADV. CO. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Nos. 68-141-Civ., 68-749-Civ.

294 F.Supp. 412 (1968)

E. B. ELLIOTT ADV. CO., Plaintiff, Henry F. Hill, Intervenor, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant. E. B. ELLIOTT ADV. CO., etc., Outdoor Media, Inc., etc., Donnelly Advertising of Florida, etc., and Webster Outdoor Advertising Co., etc., Plaintiffs, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. Florida.

November 20, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp & Ware, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs.

Fred R. Stanton, Miami Beach, Fla., for intervenor.

Thomas C. Britton, Miami, Fla., for defendant.

FINAL JUDGMENT

CABOT, District Judge.

These two cases, in which the validity of Ordinance No. 63-26 of Dade County, Florida (Section 33-121.10 through Section 33-121.17 of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida) is challenged, came on for trial, having been consolidated since the issues were the same. The challenged ordinance regulates commercial signs within 600 feet of the right-of-way of the Dade County expressways, including outdoor advertising...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases