1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 280 F.Supp.
  5. 280 F.Supp. 425 (1968)
 

UNITED STATES v. HARTH

Crim. No. 67-195.

280 F.Supp. 425 (1968)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Joe W. HARTH, Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Oklahoma.

February 21, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Raley, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff.

Robert E. Shelton and J. Stanley Gill, Savage, Gibson, Benefield & Shelton, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant.

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

The Defendant has presented to the Court a Motion for Judgment of Acquittal and for New Trial and Motion in Arrest of Judgment. Upon careful consideration of all the matters raised by both Motions, the Court concludes that they must be denied.

Defendant contends that the indictment does not properly charge a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 9121 in that it does not specify the overt act necessary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases