1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 283 F.Supp.
  5. 283 F.Supp. 417 (1968)
 

HECHT v. HARRIS, UPHAM & CO.

Civ. No. 44137.

283 F.Supp. 417 (1968)

Bertha HECHT, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS, UPHAM & CO., a partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a corporation, Arthur R. Mejia, Asa V. Wilder, George Upham Harris, Henry Upham Harris, Jr., Frank L. Patty, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. California.

March 28, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lowenthal & Lowenthal by Reed Bement, Morris Lowenthal, San Francisco, Cal., Donald F. X. Finn, New York City, for plaintiff.

E. C. Mahoney, Burlingame, Cal., for defendant Asa V. Wilder.

Cooley, Crowley, Gaither, Godward, Castro & Huddleson, Thomas Hartwell, San Francisco, Cal., Emanuel Becker, New York City, for remaining defendants.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CONTAINING THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE COURT (Rule 52 F.R.Civ.P.)*

SWEIGERT, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a customer of Harris, Upham Co., a brokerage firm dealing in securities and commodities, has brought this action against that firm and Asa V. Wilder, its Registered Representative and Commodities Manager, to recover damages for alleged violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases