1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 290 F.Supp.
  5. 290 F.Supp. 356 (1968)
 

ALUMINUM SHAPES, INC. v. K-A-LIQUIDATING COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 66-1399.

290 F.Supp. 356 (1968)

ALUMINUM SHAPES, INC., Plaintiff, v. K-A-LIQUIDATING COMPANY and Chamberlain Manufacturing Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

October 4, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thorp, Reed & Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Weis & Weis, Pittsburgh, Pa., for K-A-Liquidating Co.

Eckert, Seamans & Cherin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Chamberlain Mfg. Co.

OPINION

DUMBAULD, District Judge.

On January 22, 1965, plaintiff contracted "to supply Keystone Alloys Company with their entire aluminum extrusion needs for a period of one year" and to purchase all aluminum extrusion scrap generated at Keystone's plant in Derry. This type of contract, although inherently suspect from the antitrust standpoint, must be distinguished from a "tying clause" agreement, and is presumably justifiable on the grounds of affording...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases