1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 279 F.Supp.
  5. 279 F.Supp. 356 (1968)
 

IMPERIAL APPLIANCE CORP. v. HAMILTON MANUFACTURING CO.

No. 63-C-291.

279 F.Supp. 356 (1968)

IMPERIAL APPLIANCE CORPORATION and Thomas J. Linane, Plaintiffs, v. HAMILTON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. Wisconsin.

January 19, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Puerner, of Michael, Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, Wis., and Eugene C. Knoblock, South Bend, Ind., for plaintiffs.

A. F. Rankin, Manitowoc, Wis., and L. C. Noyes and Arlie O. Boswell, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

DECISION

GRUBB, Senior District Judge.

This action for breach of contract is before the court on trial solely of the preliminary issue of interpretation of the agreement which relates to royalty payments under a license of patented invention covering clothes drying machines manufactured and sold by defendant.1

Imperial Appliance Corporation ("Imperial") as licensor, and Hamilton...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases